The image converter no longer works for me:

Perhaps it's because now browsers require https to upload files? Tested on both Firefox and Chrome...

Anyone knows an offline image converter? It's for... work.

@codewiz The POST request returns something like "server error", so it's probably not for lack of trying on behalf of the browser...

@patrick So maybe their backend is really broken... I'll try contacting the authors.

@codewiz When I was searching for one, I ended up instead looking at instructions on how to accomplish that with gimp: reducing resolution and the colours does it. Should also be doable with Imagemagick.

@globalc I'm trying with ImageMagick:

convert bernie-thumb-square.jpg -scale 160x160 -dither FloydSteinberg -remap c64_palette.png out.png

but the result looks too "good" for the :

In part, it's because nobody was doing Floyd–Steinberg dithering back in the day (ImageMagick doesn't have a lot of options).

In part, it's also because the was constrained to 4 colors per character cell in multicolor mode.

@globalc @root

@codewiz That's awesome!
I was just thinking if there were also some "typical c64 colors", one could mass-grab c64 game screenshots for that from the net and look at the used colors.. but your result here is already great!

@codewiz You could try with cutting down resolution a bit more. Cutting down colors might be harder.

@globalc @root Without dithering at all, it also looks wrong (any artist would have used some dithering):

@codewiz @root
First result looks to me already like from a c64 demo

@codewiz @root
First result looks to me already like from a c64 demo. Maybe shirt sticks out a bit - mastodon cuts that off at the preview of the pic.

@globalc @root I could make an animgif version using 60hz flickering to create intermediate color shades!

@codewiz @root
Would be a nice hack, but effectively blow up file size, and look like a much smaller version of the image with the direct intermediate colors..

@codewiz @root
btw, this reminded me of that quote I got from somewhere, "the whole moon landing was done with less computing power than 2 c64 deliver.."

@root I tried this one too, but it only outputs c64 file formats (or executables), and the result isn't great:

@root Oh wait... I'm confused. This is the one I tried:

@globalc @codewiz Finding someone who uses c64 dithering is harder than I expected. it's a lost art... There's no reason to use one-dimensional error diffusion anymore. Resetting the error for each line seems funny these days

@root @globalc Maybe there's some C64 image viewer that can read and display a bmp or gif file?

If I can find a good one, I'll use it to load my mugshot and then take a screenshot 😏

@codewiz @root
I was thinking the same.. or maybe there was an "established" picture format for the c64, aimed at efficiency for the c64, converting to that could also help.
bmp spends 3 byte per pixel, that's crazily much for what the c64 can actually do.

Wow, there was even a jpeg decoder...
...and it's blazingly fast! 😲

@globalc @root @mike @patrick

First time I hear of this SuperCPU... it's an accelerator card for the C64 based on a 20MHz 8/16-bit processor with a 6502 backwards-compatibility mode:

@globalc @root @mike @patrick

@codewiz @globalc The VIC-II has more restrictions than just the palette. takes care of all that and you can manipulate dithering and color handling live until you like the result.

This mcDRAW totally *RULEZ*!

But why mcDRAW and not c64DRAW? 😜

@patrick @globalc @root @mike

@codewiz @globalc @root @mike "for Multicolor". It doesn't seem to support hires mode (twice the horizontal pixels, but only 2 colors in each 8x8 block instead of 4).


The converter we used for 'trouwfuif' ( ) is convertron3000 by fieserwolf; . It outputs koala (multicolor) or hires, though I did not use hires. I tried a preview and after initial promising results, "oh yeah that was before color collision removal, hmm, yes, this is very... not the same thing."